Skip to main content

Neuro-Symbolic AI: Bridging the Gap Towards Human-like Understanding

 

Neuro-Symbolic AI: Bridging the Gap Towards Human-like Understanding

The field of artificial intelligence (AI) is constantly evolving, with researchers striving to create systems that can not only process information but also understand and reason about the world in ways similar to humans. Neuro-symbolic AI has emerged as a promising direction in this pursuit, aiming to construct sophisticated computational AI models by integrating neural and symbolic learning and reasoning.1 This hybrid approach seeks to harness the complementary strengths of neural networks, which excel at pattern recognition and learning from vast amounts of data, and symbolic AI, which is adept at logical reasoning and knowledge representation.1 By overcoming the inherent limitations of each paradigm when used in isolation, neuro-symbolic AI endeavors to build robust AI capable of reasoning, learning, and cognitive modeling, ultimately bridging the gap towards human-like understanding.3 A critical component of human intelligence that remains a significant challenge for current AI systems is common sense reasoning.4 This report will delve into how neuro-symbolic AI is tackling this challenge, exploring the integration of neural and symbolic approaches to imbue AI with the capacity for common sense, thereby paving the way for more human-like understanding.

The Imperative of Common Sense in Artificial Intelligence

While purely neural networks have achieved remarkable success in various domains, they often fall short when it comes to logical reasoning, abstraction, and grasping the subtleties of language and context.2 These models can often operate as "black boxes," making it difficult to understand the rationale behind their decisions, thus limiting their explainability and robustness.6 Conversely, purely symbolic systems, while powerful in logical deduction and providing clear explanations, tend to be brittle and require extensive manual effort to encode knowledge. They also struggle with the inherent noise and uncertainty of real-world data and perceptual tasks.2 Furthermore, as the volume and complexity of knowledge increase, symbolic systems encounter significant scalability issues.8 A fundamental aspect of human intelligence that underpins our ability to navigate the world and interact with it effectively is common sense knowledge. This encompasses our understanding of everyday objects, events, and situations, as well as an intuitive grasp of physics and psychology.4 Without this common sense, AI systems face limitations in their ability to adapt to new scenarios, exhibit robustness in the face of unexpected inputs, provide understandable explanations for their actions, and collaborate seamlessly with humans.4 The motivation behind neuro-symbolic AI lies in its potential to overcome these individual limitations by merging the strengths of neural and symbolic approaches, aiming to create AI systems with more general and human-like reasoning capabilities.2

Neuro-Symbolic Architectures for Common Sense

To integrate learning and reasoning for common sense, various architectural approaches have been proposed in the field of neuro-symbolic AI. Henry Kautz's taxonomy offers a foundational classification, outlining categories such as Symbolic Neural symbolic, where symbolic inputs and outputs are processed by neural networks, commonly seen in natural language processing.3 Another category, Symbolic[Neural], involves using symbolic techniques to invoke neural capabilities, exemplified by systems like AlphaGo.3 Neural | Symbolic architectures utilize neural networks to interpret perceptual data as symbols for subsequent symbolic reasoning.3 Neural: Symbolic → Neural approaches employ symbolic reasoning to generate or label training data for neural networks.3 Neural_Symbolic_ architectures generate neural networks from symbolic rules, as seen in Neural Theorem Provers.3 Lastly, Neural architectures allow neural models to directly call upon symbolic reasoning engines.3 Beyond this, a distinction can be made between composite frameworks, which maintain separate symbolic and neural components, and monolithic frameworks, which deeply integrate logical reasoning within neural networks. Composite frameworks can be further categorized based on the supervision of the neural component, either direct or indirect, while monolithic frameworks include logically wired neural networks and tensorised logic programs. These diverse architectures represent different strategies for combining the distinct advantages of neural networks and symbolic reasoning. The selection of a specific architecture often depends on the particular task at hand and the desired emphasis on learning, reasoning, or other crucial properties such as interpretability and the need for large amounts of training data.7 Hybrid architectures, in general, aim to capitalize on large-scale learning while harnessing the representational and computational power inherent in symbol manipulation.3

Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Neuro-Symbolic Systems

A cornerstone of neuro-symbolic AI in addressing common sense reasoning lies in the effective representation and manipulation of knowledge. Knowledge graphs (KGs) serve as a pivotal element in this endeavor, acting as a bridge between the structured world of symbolic logic and the continuous space of deep learning.12 They provide a structured format to represent knowledge using nodes for entities and edges for the relationships between them, allowing neuro-symbolic systems to reason and make inferences. Ontologies further contribute by offering structured frameworks for organizing knowledge within specific domains, enabling AI systems to understand and reason about complex concepts and their interrelations.13 Logic programming languages, such as Prolog, play a crucial role in formally representing knowledge and performing logical deduction within neuro-symbolic AI, particularly in applications demanding explicit reasoning.15 These symbolic methods collectively enhance the transparency and interpretability of neuro-symbolic systems, making their reasoning processes more understandable and verifiable.6 By leveraging these knowledge representation techniques, neuro-symbolic systems can learn from data while simultaneously incorporating explicit knowledge and rules, leading to more robust and explainable AI.2

Acquiring Common Sense Knowledge in Neuro-Symbolic AI

A significant hurdle in achieving human-like understanding is the acquisition of common sense knowledge, which is often tacit and challenging to formalize.18 Neuro-symbolic AI explores various methods to address this. These include leveraging natural language processing to read and extract information from text, learning from observed human behavior, employing interactive systems like chatbots to elicit knowledge, constructing knowledge graphs from diverse sources, utilizing expert knowledge, and even employing crowdsourcing techniques.18 A key aspect is enabling neuro-symbolic systems to learn from data while also integrating explicit knowledge and rules.2 This involves the ability to learn abstract concepts and the rules that govern them from linguistic data.21 One promising approach involves using neural networks to identify patterns and features in data, which are then used to automatically generate symbolic rules and build knowledge graphs.22 Furthermore, the emergence of foundation models and large language models (LLMs) presents new opportunities for enhancing neuro-symbolic learning and reasoning. These models, trained on vast amounts of data, possess a wealth of implicit knowledge that can be leveraged by neuro-symbolic systems.23 LLMs can also assist in the crucial tasks of ontology engineering and prompt engineering, further facilitating the development of neuro-symbolic AI with common sense.25

Reasoning Mechanisms for Human-like Understanding

Neuro-symbolic AI aims to replicate human-like understanding by addressing specific reasoning mechanisms crucial for common sense. This includes reasoning about causality, intentions, and naive physics. To enable causal reasoning, neuro-symbolic approaches integrate causal inference techniques with neural networks and symbolic knowledge, allowing for the understanding of cause-and-effect relationships and the ability to perform counterfactual reasoning.5 Reasoning about intentions involves deciphering the underlying goals and motivations behind actions, often requiring the inference of implicit presumptions using common sense.3 Systems like CORGI employ neuro-symbolic theorem proving to uncover these hidden assumptions in natural language commands.20 Naive physics reasoning, which deals with understanding how objects interact in the physical world, is tackled by combining symbolic knowledge with detailed physical simulations.5 For instance, systems can reason about the behavior of falling objects or the properties of liquids through this integrated approach.26

Applications of Neuro-Symbolic AI with Common Sense Reasoning

The integration of neuro-symbolic AI with common sense reasoning is finding applications across various domains. In robotics, it enables robots to better perceive their surroundings, make more informed decisions, plan actions effectively, and interact with humans in a more intuitive manner.7 For question answering, it allows AI systems to understand the context of queries, resolve ambiguities, and perform complex reasoning to provide more accurate and explainable answers.7 In natural language understanding, neuro-symbolic AI enhances tasks such as machine translation and information extraction by incorporating logical reasoning alongside neural networks' comprehension abilities.3 Beyond these, applications extend to healthcare for diagnostics and treatment planning, finance for fraud detection and risk assessment, cybersecurity for threat analysis, manufacturing for predictive maintenance, retail for personalized recommendations, and education for creating adaptive learning experiences.27 The ability of these systems to provide more transparent and understandable reasoning is particularly advantageous in safety-critical and high-stakes domains like healthcare and autonomous vehicles.9

Challenges and Limitations in Scaling Common Sense Reasoning

Despite the significant progress, scaling common sense reasoning in neuro-symbolic AI presents several challenges. Scalability remains a major hurdle, especially as the complexity of knowledge and the depth of reasoning required increase.3 Traditional symbolic AI has long faced a "knowledge acquisition bottleneck," where the manual encoding of vast amounts of common sense knowledge becomes impractical.8 Learning new symbolic rules from data in a robust and scalable manner is an active area of research.1 Maintaining logical consistency when integrating the rigid rules of symbolic AI with the probabilistic nature of neural networks is another key implementation challenge.30 Furthermore, the computational demands of managing and reasoning over large knowledge bases while simultaneously running neural computations can lead to concerns about efficiency.30 Ultimately, current AI systems, including those employing neuro-symbolic approaches, still fall short of possessing true common sense and struggle to adapt to novel situations without extensive prior training.4

Evaluation and Benchmarking of Common Sense in Neuro-Symbolic AI

Evaluating the effectiveness of neuro-symbolic AI systems in achieving common sense reasoning is a complex task. It requires assessing both the neural and symbolic components individually, as well as their integration.6 While several benchmarks for common sense reasoning exist, such as the Winograd Schema Challenge and the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC), they have limitations in truly capturing the breadth and depth of human common sense.32 These benchmarks may focus on specific aspects of reasoning or be susceptible to solutions that do not genuinely reflect common sense understanding.34 There is a recognized need for new evaluation paradigms that can better assess the holistic common sense reasoning abilities of hybrid AI systems.36 This includes the development of more realistic and interactive tasks, the creation of novel metrics for evaluation, and the use of simulation environments to test common sense in dynamic settings.38

Future Directions and Expert Perspectives

The future of neuro-symbolic AI in achieving human-like common sense reasoning is marked by several promising trends. These include a focus on anticipatory thinking, enabling AI to predict future events; meta-cognition, allowing AI to reason about its own reasoning; and advancements in causality and counterfactual reasoning.4 Harnessing common sense from diverse modalities, supporting multilinguality, exploring lateral thinking, and fostering human-AI teaming are also key directions.38 Experts in the field believe that neuro-symbolic AI represents a significant step towards more human-like language understanding and reasoning by effectively combining data-driven learning with structured symbolic reasoning.3 However, fundamental research questions remain, such as determining the optimal ways to integrate neural and symbolic architectures, how to represent and extract symbolic knowledge within neural networks, how to effectively learn and reason with common sense knowledge, and how to handle abstract concepts.3 A crucial area for future development is the creation of neuro-symbolic systems capable of learning new symbolic rules from data and reasoning with them in a flexible manner.40 There is also a growing consensus on the importance of interdisciplinary research, particularly in ensuring the explainability and trustworthiness of neuro-symbolic AI systems as they become more sophisticated.7

Conclusion

Neuro-symbolic AI stands as a compelling paradigm that seeks to bridge the gap towards human-like understanding by synergistically combining the strengths of neural networks and symbolic AI. By focusing on common sense reasoning, this field addresses a critical limitation of current AI systems. The use of knowledge graphs, ontologies, and logic programming provides powerful tools for representing and manipulating the vast and intricate knowledge that constitutes common sense. While significant strides have been made in various applications, the journey towards truly human-like common sense reasoning is fraught with challenges, particularly in scaling these systems and developing robust evaluation methods. Nevertheless, the future of neuro-symbolic AI is bright, with ongoing research exploring advanced reasoning mechanisms, seamless integration techniques, and innovative approaches to knowledge acquisition. Expert perspectives underscore the transformative potential of this field in creating AI systems that are not only intelligent but also understandable, reliable, and capable of interacting with the world and with humans in a more meaningful and intuitive way.

Works cited

  1. Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence - Volume Pre-press, issue Pre-press - Journals, accessed May 10, 2025, https://content.iospress.com/journals/neurosymbolic-artificial-intelligence

  2. Neurosymbolic AI: Bridging Neural Networks and Symbolic Reasoning for Smarter Systems, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.netguru.com/blog/neurosymbolic-ai

  3. Neuro-symbolic AI - Wikipedia, accessed May 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuro-symbolic_AI

  4. Common Sense Reasoning for Neuro-Symbolic AI | Request PDF, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387336650_Common_Sense_Reasoning_for_Neuro-Symbolic_AI

  5. Neuro-symbolic AI brings us closer to machines with common sense - TechTalks, accessed May 10, 2025, https://bdtechtalks.com/2022/03/14/neuro-symbolic-ai-common-sense/

  6. A Survey on Verification and Validation, Testing and Evaluations of Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence | Papers With Code, accessed May 10, 2025, https://paperswithcode.com/paper/a-survey-on-verification-and-validation

  7. Towards Cognitive AI Systems: a Survey and Prospective on Neuro-Symbolic AI - arXiv, accessed May 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.01040

  8. Understanding the Limitations of Symbolic AI ... - SmythOS, accessed May 10, 2025, https://smythos.com/ai-agents/ai-agent-development/symbolic-ai-limitations/

  9. Symbolic AI and Neural Networks: Combining Logic and Learning for Smarter AI Systems, accessed May 10, 2025, https://smythos.com/ai-agents/agent-architectures/symbolic-ai-and-neural-networks/

  10. Neuro-symbolic AI brings us closer to machines with common sense - TNW, accessed May 10, 2025, https://thenextweb.com/news/neuro-symbolic-ai-closer-machines-with-common-sense

  11. arxiv.org, accessed May 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22077

  12. Neuro-Symbolic AI with AllegroGraph, accessed May 10, 2025, https://allegrograph.com/products/neuro-symbolic-ai/

  13. Neuro - Symbolic AI | Bosch Center for Artificial Intelligence, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.bosch-ai.com/research/fields-of-expertise/neuro-symbolic-ai/

  14. Symbolic AI in Knowledge Graphs: Bridging Logic and Data for Smarter Solutions, accessed May 10, 2025, https://smythos.com/ai-agents/agent-architectures/symbolic-ai-in-knowledge-graphs/

  15. Neurosymbolic Programming - Texas Computer Science, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~swarat/pubs/PGL-049-Plain.pdf

  16. Breakthroughs in LLM Reasoning Show a Path Forward for Neuro ..., accessed May 10, 2025, https://law.stanford.edu/2024/12/20/breakthroughs-in-llm-reasoning-show-a-path-forward-for-neuro-symbolic-legal-ai/

  17. Hybrid AI Models: Combining Symbolic Reasoning and Deep Learning for Enhanced Decision-Making - ResearchGate, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384429273_Hybrid_AI_Models_Combining_Symbolic_Reasoning_and_Deep_Learning_for_Enhanced_Decision-Making

  18. What is commonsense knowledge? — Klu, accessed May 10, 2025, https://klu.ai/glossary/commonsense-knowledge

  19. The Common Sense Knowledge Bottleneck in AI: A Barrier to True Artificial Intelligence, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.alphanome.ai/post/the-common-sense-knowledge-bottleneck-in-ai-a-barrier-to-true-artificial-intelligence

  20. ojs.aaai.org, accessed May 10, 2025, https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/16623/16430

  21. Neuro-Symbolic AI in NLP - goML, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.goml.io/neuro-symbolic-ai-in-nlp/

  22. Neuro-Symbolic AI: Why Is It The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Startup Kitchen, accessed May 10, 2025, https://startupkitchen.community/neuro-symbolic-ai-why-is-it-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence/

  23. The Role of Foundation Models in Neuro-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning - arXiv, accessed May 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01889

  24. Neurosymbolic AI for EGI, accessed May 10, 2025, https://nesy-egi.github.io/

  25. Call for Papers: Special Issue on Neurosymbolic AI and Ontologies, accessed May 10, 2025, https://neurosymbolic-ai-journal.com/content/call-papers-special-issue-neurosymbolic-ai-and-ontologies

  26. Naive Physics Reasoning by Simulation [Artificial Intelligence], accessed May 10, 2025, https://ai.uni-bremen.de/research/naive-physics

  27. Neuro Symbolic AI: Enhancing Common Sense in AI, accessed May 10, 2025, https://med.unibl.org/neuro-symbolic-ai-enhancing-common-sense-in-ai-2/

  28. Neuro-symbolic AI: AI with reasoning: By Raktim Singh, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.finextra.com/blogposting/26508/neuro-symbolic-ai-ai-with-reasoning

  29. The Future of AI Engineering: Navigating Trends and Seizing Opportunities in 2024, accessed May 10, 2025, https://nebulai.com/ai-engineering-trends-2024/

  30. Exploring Symbolic AI and Ontologies: Enhancing ... - SmythOS, accessed May 10, 2025, https://smythos.com/ai-agents/agent-architectures/symbolic-ai-and-ontologies/

  31. [2501.05435] Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review - arXiv, accessed May 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05435

  32. Commonsense Reasoning using AI - Exploring AI, accessed May 10, 2025, https://unimatrixz.com/topics/ai-text/nlp-tasks/reasoning/complex-reasoning/commonsense-reasoning/

  33. CRoW – Benchmarking Commonsense Reasoning in Real-World Tasks - Mete Ismayilzada, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.mete.is/crow/

  34. arxiv.org, accessed May 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2501.06642

  35. 6 Limitations of AI & Why it Won't Quite Take Over In 2023! - Adcock Solutions, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.adcocksolutions.com/post/6-limitations-of-ai-why-it-wont-quite-take-over-in-2023

  36. Paradigms of AI Evaluation: Mapping Goals, Methodologies and Culture - arXiv, accessed May 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2502.15620v1

  37. Hybrid AI Reasoning: Integrating Rule-Based Logic with Transformer Inference, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202504.1453/v1

  38. Call for Papers: Special Issue on Commonsense Reasoning ..., accessed May 10, 2025, https://neurosymbolic-ai-journal.com/content/call-papers-special-issue-commonsense-reasoning

  39. Anthropic Unveils Revolutionary 'Hybrid Reasoning' AI Model - Elufa Systems, accessed May 10, 2025, https://elufasys.com/anthropic-unveils-revolutionary-hybrid-reasoning-ai-model/

  40. Unlocking the Potential of Generative AI through Neuro-Symbolic Architectures – Benefits and Limitations - arXiv, accessed May 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2502.11269v1

  41. Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence for human reasoning - Tech4Future, accessed May 10, 2025, https://tech4future.info/en/neuro-symbolic-artificial-intelligence/
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Achieving Fluid, Trustworthy, and Contextually Aware Human-Robot Collaboration in Unstructured Environments

  Achieving Fluid, Trustworthy, and Contextually Aware Human-Robot Collaboration in Unstructured Environments The integration of robots into diverse sectors beyond traditional industrial applications is rapidly increasing, encompassing service robotics, home assistance, and critical areas such as disaster relief. 1 This expansion brings forth the unique challenges presented by unstructured environments, which necessitate robots to exhibit a high degree of adaptability, robustness, and the ability to engage in seamless interaction with humans. 4 To fully realize the potential of robots as collaborative partners rather than mere tools, the development of fluid, trustworthy, and contextually aware collaboration is of paramount importance. 7 The transition from robots performing isolated tasks to working alongside humans in unpredictable settings requires a fundamental shift in their design, focusing on intelligence and interaction capabilities that can understand and respond to the...
Post a Comment
Read more

AI for Resilient Autonomous Operations and Scientific Discovery in Extreme and Unpredictable Environments

AI for Resilient Autonomous Operations and Scientific Discovery in Extreme and Unpredictable Environments Introduction: Defining Extreme Environments and the Critical Role of AI-Driven Autonomous Systems. Extreme environments represent a class of settings that impose significant operational and technological challenges due to conditions far exceeding the normal parameters for human comfort and conventional technology. These environments are inherently resource-constrained , characterized by limitations in energy availability, computational power, communication bandwidth, and essential consumables. They are also fundamentally dynamic , exhibiting rapid and often unpredictable shifts in environmental conditions. Furthermore, these locations are often largely unknown , with sparse or incomplete prior data and understanding. Examples of such environments are diverse and include deep space missions navigating vacuum, radiation, and immense distances; sub-oceanic exploration contending with ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Probing Emergent Cognitive Architectures: Towards Self-Understanding and Principled Reasoning in Advanced AI

  Probing Emergent Cognitive Architectures: Towards Self-Understanding and Principled Reasoning in Advanced AI The field of artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing, with systems exhibiting increasingly sophisticated capabilities. A particularly intriguing area of research focuses on emergent cognitive architectures, where complex, high-level cognitive functions arise from the interaction of simpler underlying components. This phenomenon is often observed unexpectedly as the scale of AI models increases. 1 Complementary to this is the pursuit of self-understanding in advanced AI, which refers to a system's capacity to possess an internal representation of its own abilities, limitations, and internal states, potentially mirroring human self-awareness. 3 Furthermore, the development of principled reasoning in AI is crucial, enabling systems to make decisions and draw inferences based on explicit rules, logic, or causal models, rather than relying solely on pattern matching lear...
Post a Comment
Read more